Edwin smith papyrus summary1/6/2024 The papyrus includes 48 cases of wounds, injuries and fractures topographically ordered from the skull, neck, upper limbs, chest to the thoracolumbar spine. Before going into detail on the spinal injury cases, it is important to appraise the style and perspective the papyrus was written in. For the clinical appraisal of the spinal injury cases, this latter translation was used for the current review. After thoroughly reinterpreting the original hieratic document, Sanchez and Burridge are currently producing a novel “medically based translation” of the Edwin Smith papyrus. After the publication of his translation in 1930, several other Egyptologists and physicians suggested alternative interpretations of a number of hieroglyphs and fragments written in the original text. Īlthough his translation of the Edwin Smith papyrus is still regarded as a masterpiece, Breasted encountered several problems in his interpretation of the text. Nonetheless, the original authorship remains a controversial issue. and probably is a copy of an older document. A recent reappraisal summarized that the papyrus was most likely penned in the seventeenth century b.c. Breasted suggested that the Egyptian physician Imhotep, who served under the Third Dynasty of pharaoh Djoser (twentysixth century b.c.), could have been the author of the original text. This information led to further speculations on the original authorship. Interestingly, since the hieroglyphics used in the text were more common in earlier times, around 3,000–2,500 b.c., he-and others-believed that the scroll must be a copy of an older text. Based on his vast experience and extensive research, Breasted concluded that the papyrus must have been written during the sixteenth century b.c.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |